They make this toxin at the refinery

Study: Bisphenol A, used in plastic, lingers in body

By Susanne Rust and Meg Kissinger • Milwaukee Journal Sentinel • January 28, 2009

A study being released today finds that bisphenol A, a chemical widely used to make plastic and suspected of causing cancer, stays in the body much longer than previously thought.

Advertisement

The findings are significant because the longer the chemical lingers in the body, the greater chance it has of doing harm, scientists say.

Researchers from the University of Rochester in New York also say the chemical may get into the body from sources such as plastic water pipes or dust from carbonless paper and not only from food containers that leach the chemical when heated.

The study results, published in Environmental Health Perspectives, have sparked a flurry of concern and renewed calls for regulation.

“The study reinforces the urgent need for stricter government oversight and regulation of this extremely toxic chemical,” said Janet Nudelman, director of program and policy at the Breast Cancer Fund, a health advocacy group. “It adds to what we already know about BPA, a chemical so powerful that at extremely low levels — parts per billion or even parts per trillion — it can cross the placenta and alter the mammary gland of the developing fetus, increasing breast cancer risk later in life.”

BPA, used to make baby bottles, dental sealants, food storage containers and thousands of other household products, was found in 93% of Americans tested.

The new study, conducted by Richard Stahlhut at the University of Rochester, used data on humans collected by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Researchers looked at urine samples of 1,469 U.S. adults. They compared the levels of BPA based on how long the subjects had fasted.

The American Chemistry Council, which represents makers of BPA, maintains that the chemical is safe for all uses. Steven Hentges, spokesman for the trade group, dismissed the study as inherently limited.

“The authors’ conclusions are, at best, speculation,” Hentges said. “Low levels of BPA found in the data are not a risk to human health.”

BPA has been linked to spikes in breast cancer, diabetes and heart disease, even at very low levels. It has also been found to interfere with chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel had 10 household products tested and found toxic levels of BPA leaching from all of them.

Canada declared BPA to be a toxin and banned its use in baby bottles last year. In the United States, 14 states are considering similar action.

Federal regulators have been divided on the issue.

A group of scientists from the National Toxicology Program expressed some concern last year about the chemical for infants and children. But the Food and Drug Administration has said BPA is safe for all use.

The newspaper found federal regulators favored industry-financed studies in their assessments. Entire sections of the FDA’s assessment contained identical language to reports written on behalf of chemical-makers or others with a financial stake in BPA.

The FDA safety assessment relied on two studies, both paid for by chemical-makers, and ignored hundreds of independent studies that found the chemical to cause harm in laboratory animals.

The FDA’s own science advisory board has recommended that the FDA reconsider its ruling. FDA administrators have promised to study the matter further but so far have stood by their assessment.

Stahlhut’s study is likely to reignite concerns about the chemical’s safety.

“This is bound to shake things up,” Stahlhut said. “It is saying that our risk assessments are wrong. Things we thought we knew aren’t necessarily so.”

The research indicates for the first time that people are either constantly being bombarded with bisphenol A from non-food sources, such as receipts and plastic water piping, or they are storing the chemical in fat cells, unable to get rid of it as quickly as scientists have believed.

“It provides evidence that we are being exposed to more BPA than we think — and that contaminated food and beverages may not even be the main source “ of our BPA exposure, said Patricia Hunt, a professor at Washington State University who pioneered studies linking BPA to cancer. “Scary, huh?”

Scientists previously thought that BPA metabolized quickly, with half the concentration eliminated between four and six hours and all of it gone by 24 hours. Instead, Stahlhut, Shanna Swan, also of Rochester, and Wade Welshons of the University of Missouri-Columbia found that the levels dropped but then leveled off after eight hours — and never disappeared.

“They hang in there like a London fog,” Stahlhut said.

Plastic chemical may stay in body longer: study

Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:48pm GMT
Email | Print|

| Single Page

[] Text [+]
Photo
1 of 1Full Size

By Will Dunham

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A controversial chemical used in many plastic products may remain in the body longer than previously thought, and people may be ingesting it from sources other than food, U.S. researchers said on Wednesday.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration in December said it planned more research into the safety of bisphenol A, or BPA, but the agency indicated no immediate plans to curb the chemical, found in baby bottles and other products.

Dr. Richard Stahlhut of the University of Rochester and colleagues looked at levels of the chemical in the urine of 1,469 U.S. adults who took part in a government health survey.

While the belief had been BPA was quickly and completely eliminated from the body through urine, this study found people who had fasted for even a whole day still had significant levels of the chemical.

Stahlhut said this suggested BPA may hang around in the body longer than previously known or that it may get into the body through sources other than just food, perhaps including tap water or house dust. Stahlhut added that BPA may get into fat tissue, from where it might be released more slowly.

“If it leaves the body quickly, then it reduces the amount of time when it can cause problems. If it does cause problems, obviously if it stays around much longer, then that changes the game,” Stahlhut, whose study appears in the Environmental Health Perspectives journal, said in a telephone interview.

BPA is used in many food and beverage containers, the coating of food cans and some medical devices. It mimics the hormone estrogen in the body. People consume it when it leaches from plastic into baby formula, water or food in a container.

The researchers tracked how urine levels of BPA declined based on the length of time a person had fasted. But they found that people who fasted for 8.5 hours, for example, had about the same BPA levels as those who fasted 24 hours.

Advertisements